Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3160 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $65.81 vs $270.23
- Up to 74% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-14700F - $0.27 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i5-5675C - 289 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 28 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
274
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
25%
Price, €
€299.95
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |