Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2132 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $65.81 vs $102.37
- Up to 29% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600 - $0.3 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-5675C - 270 vs 247 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
247
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9815 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
71%
Price, €
€113.63
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |