Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2426 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $65.81 vs $83.34
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-12100 - $0.3 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-5675C - 252 vs 241 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-5675C - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
241
95.63492063492063%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
81.08108108108108%
Price, €
€92.51
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €92.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
62.35458352722196%
Multi-Core
4079
59.31365420968445%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |