Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1812 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $65.81 vs $335.61
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10300 - $0.56 vs $2.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-5675C - 134 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
130
97.01492537313433%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7568 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
20.143884892086334%
Price, €
€372.53
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Single-Core
1340
85.62300319488818%
Multi-Core
4079
85.06777893639207%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |