Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 818 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $65.81 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77113 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
157
97.51552795031056%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
10%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
87.38805970149254%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |