Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-5675C outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-5675C is 934 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 121 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8350 - $65.81 vs $135.27
- Up to 56% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8350 - $0.6 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2403 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |