Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $102.94 vs $182.8
- Up to 43% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900F - $0.53 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-4690S - 219 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
215
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
56%
Price, €
€202.91
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |