Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $38.03 vs $204.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10850K - $0.24 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4690S - 182 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
174
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
19%
Price, €
€226.44
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |