Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 749 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 233 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $38.76 vs $57.05
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.18 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 88 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16686 minutes ago
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |