Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $38.76 vs $160.13
- Up to 75% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-10700F - $0.21 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4690K - 212 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
205
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
25%
Price, €
€177.74
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |