Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $38.76 vs $106.02
- Up to 62% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-11600KF - $0.24 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i5-4690K - 188 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
183
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
38%
Price, €
€117.68
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |