Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $38.76 vs $90.67
- Up to 56% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-10600KF - $0.49 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Core i5-4690K - 91 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
87
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14148 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
44%
Price, €
€100.64
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |