Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $38.76 vs $73.09
- Up to 47% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400F - $0.27 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-4690K - 159 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
158
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2713 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
52%
Price, €
€81.13
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |