Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $38.76 vs $71.78
- Up to 45% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10105F - $0.34 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4690K - 129 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
125
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
54%
Price, €
€79.68
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |