Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2002 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $53.52 vs $782.37
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 88 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-4690K - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 48 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €59.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for €868.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
77.20455908818236%
Multi-Core
3631
27.26590072839228%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |