Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1186 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 235 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $38.76 vs $80.42
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.18 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 88 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15333 minutes ago
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |