Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 587 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than FX-8300 - 56 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than FX-8300 - $38.76 vs $81.91
- Up to 63% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8300 - $0.77 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 88 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17649 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17648 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |