Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $40.95 vs $58.5
- Up to 30% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-9100F - $0.21 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-4690 - 216 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
213
98.61111111111111%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5631 minutes ago
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5636 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
86.68122270742357%
Multi-Core
3303
90.02452984464432%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |