Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $37.6 vs $71.78
- Up to 45% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-10105F - $0.21 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4690 - 209 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
203
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
55%
Price, €
€79.68
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |