Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1197 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $87.96 vs $456.96
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 32 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €97.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
109
99.0909090909091%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
19%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
98.32073887489504%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |