Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $37.6 vs $288.82
- Up to 86% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.41 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 84 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4690 - 112 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
103
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17924 minutes ago
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |