Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $40.41 vs $420.43
- Up to 86% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900KS - $0.24 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 50% better in Rust than Core i5-4670S - 276 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 32 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
184
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7445 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
14%
Price, €
€466.68
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €466.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |