Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1782 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $40.41 vs $135.27
- Up to 70% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.38 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4670S - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
30%
Price, €
€150.15
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |