Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 222 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than FX-8300 - 259 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8300 - $40.41 vs $81.91
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8300 - $0.17 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17848 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17847 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |