Buy on Amazon
€42.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 33% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 171 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - $27.05 vs $38.03
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 55 vs 84 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core i5-4670K
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75108 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
33.94422310756972%
Multi-Core
739
20.85214446952596%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.