Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3077 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $102.01 vs $215.69
- Up to 7% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-12900KF - $2.52 vs $2.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 96% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-4670 - 88 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
45
51%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.72/FPS
92%
Price, €
€239.42
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €239.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |