Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670 is 456 days older than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $43.86 vs $314.37
- Up to 86% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-5820K - $0.29 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1660 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
14.077669902912621%
Price, €
€348.95
13%
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |