Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4670 - 555 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $70.19 vs $102.01
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4670 - $0.14 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |