Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $51.18 vs $548.4
- Up to 91% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.03 vs $10.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i5-4670 - 56 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3196 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.87/FPS
9%
Price, €
€608.72
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |