Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8150 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $59.97 vs $102.37
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-4670 - $0.52 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
61.1764705882353%
Price, €
€113.63
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
127
95.48872180451127%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |