Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3061 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $107.65 vs $336.34
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KF - $0.97 vs $2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4590T - 163 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
123
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €119.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
42%
Price, €
€373.34
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €373.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |