Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $51.18 vs $62.24
- Up to 13% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4570T - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
126
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16833 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
86%
Price, €
€69.09
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |