Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4570T is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6100 - 125 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-4570T - $21.68 vs $51.18
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |