Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $51.18 vs $121.27
- Up to 51% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600KF - $0.34 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4570 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
167
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13001 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
49%
Price, €
€134.61
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €134.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |