Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2572 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $38.66 vs $130.12
- Up to 66% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.13 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4460T - 377 vs 329 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
329
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
34%
Price, €
€144.43
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €144.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |