Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2252 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $38.66 vs $160.13
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700F - $0.27 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4460T - 170 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
159
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
25%
Price, €
€177.74
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |