Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2866 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $35.65 vs $36.56
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4460T - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4460T - $0.3 vs $0.32 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
122
90.37037037037037%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
93.75%
Price, €
€39.57
100%
Buy for €39.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
50.03119151590767%
Multi-Core
2190
81.23145400593472%
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |