Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460T is 453 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1620 - 141 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - $35.65 vs $35.83
- Up to 3% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Celeron G1620 - $0.28 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3908 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
139
98.58156028368793%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
96.55172413793105%
Price, €
€39.77
99%
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
50.99750623441397%
Multi-Core
723
33.013698630136986%
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |