Buy on Amazon
€39.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 453 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 6% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 104 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $27.05 vs $35.65
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core I5-4460T I5 4460T 1.9 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for €39.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76355 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
53.11720698254364%
Multi-Core
739
33.74429223744293%
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.