Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $38.66 vs $138.16
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.27 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4460T - 171 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
160
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
30%
Price, €
€153.36
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €153.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |