Buy on Amazon
€51.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $187
Availability
MSRP in USD: $187
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $46.82 vs $138.2
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Core i5-4460 - 759 vs 699 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel Core i5-4460 LGA 1150 CPU - BX80646I54460
Buy for €51.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
1051
48.07868252516011%
Multi-Core
2928
34.12985196409838%
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.