Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $40.22 vs $71.3
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-10400F - $0.3 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4460 - 152 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
149
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
57%
Price, €
€79.14
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |