Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $93.82 vs $153.55
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-11900F - $0.64 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-4440 - 219 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
164
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12190 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
82%
Price, €
€170.44
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |