Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-4300M - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€718.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €718.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |