Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-4300M - 129 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €153.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |