Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $85.18 vs $318.06
- Up to 62% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - $1.01 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 40% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3570K - 132 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
94
71%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
37%
Price, €
€353.05
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |