Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2761 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3570K - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $38.36 vs $85.18
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3570K - $0.26 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 35 vs 77 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €94.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |