Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 151 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $37.1 vs $50.45
- Up to 27% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3570 - $0.27 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |