Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3550S - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $73.09 vs $109.64
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3550S - $0.61 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4769 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |