Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2165 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3550S - 378 vs 377 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $39.15 vs $109.64
- Up to 66% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-3550S - $0.11 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
377
99.73544973544973%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
34.375%
Price, €
€121.7
35%
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4139 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
378
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |